General Considerations on Antimicrobial Tests and Conditions Applicable in Textile Industry

Main Article Content

Ali Mohamed Elshafei

Abstract

Due to the globally increasing need for utilizing antimicrobial materials, it is necessary to improve and develop newer methods and techniques for determining the antimicrobial properties of these materials qualitatively and quantitatively, especially in the medical field. Recently there has been a debate among scientists between the difference between antimicrobial test and sterility test. For antimicrobial and microbial resistance, the test is limited to the standard methods to determine the effect of the sample as an antimicrobial without paying attention to the fact that the sample is sterile or not, unless the sample was taken into sterile atmosphere and isolated with a protective suitable sterile package cover after treatment with the antimicrobial agent because the external    atmosphere contains a lot of scattered types of bacterial and fungal microorganisms. In case of sterility test, the sample to be examined should be prepared, isolated and coated from the outside atmosphere, where the presence of microbes on the surface of the sample by standard methods is detected and in some sterilization tests it is prohibited to include an antimicrobial substance to the sample to be tested to avoid the interference with the test. In both cases the tests should be implemented in a sterilized room and conditions according to the recognized scientific principles. In conclusions, the antimicrobial test is used to make sure that the specimen is attained antimicrobial properties or not and the sterilization test is done by ensuring that the sample is free of contaminated microorganisms. This review poses on some factor and conditions affecting antimicrobial action and some standard test methods for determination of antimicrobial and sterility potential of materials.

Keywords:
Antimicrobial activity, sterility tests, mode of actions, precautions, conditions

Article Details

How to Cite
Elshafei, A. (2019). General Considerations on Antimicrobial Tests and Conditions Applicable in Textile Industry. Journal of Advances in Microbiology, 16(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/jamb/2019/v16i330123
Section
Review Article

Article Metrics


References

Jakimiak B, Röhm-Rodowald E, Staniszewska M, Cieślak M, Malinowska G, Kaleta A. Microbiological assessment of efficiency of antibacterial modified textiles. Roczniki Państwowego Zakładu Higieny. 2006;57(2):177-84.

Gouda M. Enhancing flame-resistance and antibacterial properties of cotton fabric. Journal of Industrial Textiles. 2006;36(2):167–177.

Seshadri DT, Bhat NV. Synthesis and properties of cotton fabrics modified with polypyrrole. Sen'i Gakkaishi. 2005;61(4):103–108.

Ericsson JM, Sherris JC. Antibiotic sensitivity testing: Report of an international laborative study, Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand. 1971;217:1-90.

Jorgensen JH, Turnidge JD. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA. Antibacterial susceptibility tests: Dilution and disk diffusion methods, Manual of Clinical Microbiolog; 9th ed. Washington, DC American Society for Microbiology. 2007;1152-1172.

McManus MC. Mechanisms of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 1997;54(12):1420-1433.

Ferguson D, Cahill OJ, Quilty B. Phenotypic, molecular and antibiotic resistance profiling of nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from two Irish hospitals. Journal of Medicine. 2007;1(1):1-14.

Kosowska K, Jacobs MR, Bajaksouzian S, Koeth L, Appelbaum PC. Alterations of penicillin-binding proteins 1A, 2X, and 2B in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates for which amoxicillin MICs are higher than penicillin MICs, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2004;48:4020-4022.

Chatterji, Unniraman MS, Mahadevan S, Nagaraja V. Effect of different classes of inhibitors on DNA gyrase from mycobacterium smegmatis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2001;48:479-485.

Jacoby GA, Munoz-Price LS. The new ß-lactamases. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;352:380-391.

Wickens H, Wade P. Understanding antibiotic resistance. Pharmaceutical Journal. 2005;274:501-504.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A10, Wayne, PA, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009a.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Nineteenth informational supplement M100-S19, Wayne PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009b.

Korgenski EK, Daly JA. Evaluation of the BIOMIC video reader for determining interpretive categories of isolates on the basis of disk diffusion susceptibility results, J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:302-304.

Nijs A, Cartuyvels R, Mewis A, Peeters V, Rummens JL, Magerman K. Comparison and evaluation of Osiris and Sirscan 2000 antimicrobial susceptibility systems in the clinical microbiology laboratory. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3627-3630.

Richter SS, Ferraro MJ. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA. Susceptibility testing instrumentation and computerized expert systems for data analysis and interpretation, Manual of clinical microbiology 9th ed, Washington DC. American Society for Microbiology. 2007;245-256.

AATCC. Antimicrobial activity assessment of textile materials: Parallel streak method from American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. 2004;147.

Askew PD. Measuring activity in antimicrobial textiles: A critical review. Chem Today. 2009;27(1):16–20.

Gao Y, Cranston R. Recent advances in antimicrobial treatments of textiles. Text Res J. 2008;78(1):68–72.
Doi:10.1177/0040517507082332

Höfer D. Antimicrobial textiles–evaluation of their effectiveness and safety. Biofunctional textiles and the skin, current problems of Dermatology. Karger, Basel. 2006;33:3-50.

AATCC. Antibacterial finishes on textile materials: Assessment of developed from American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists. 2004;100.

JIS L 1902:2008. Testing for antimicrobial activity and efficacy on textile products. JAFET / JSA from Japanese Industrial Standards.

American Society for Testing and Materials. (ASTM) E2149-01 Standard Test Method for determining the antimicrobial activity of immobilized antimicrobial agents under dynamic contact conditions; 2001.
DOI: 10.1520/E2149-01

Qian L, Hinestroza JP. Application of nanotechnology for high performance textiles. Journal of Textile and APPAREL, Technology and Management. 2004;4(1): 1-7.

Livermore DM. Bacterial resistance: Origins, epidemiology and impact. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:S11-S23.

Livermore DM. The need for new antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10: 1-9.

Tan LY, Sin LT, Bee ST, Ratnam CT, Woo KK, Tee TT, Rahmat AR. A review of antimicrobial fabric containing nanostructures metal‐based compound. Journal of Vinyl and Additive Technology. 2019;E3-E27. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.21606

Tawiah B, Badoe W, Fu S. Advances in the development of antimicrobial agents for textiles: The quest for natural products. Review. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe. 2016;24,3(117):136-149.
Available:DOI:10.5604/12303666.1196624